Comparing the "Opinion" of CHATGPT and gemini artificial intelligence CHATBOTS on critical transplant issues focusing on bioethics
Konstantina Karakasi1, Filippos F. Karageorgos1, Stavros Neiros1, Stella Vasileiadou1, Athanasios Kofinas1, Georgios Tsakiris1, Georgios Katsanos1, Nikolaos Antoniadis1, Georgios Tsoulfas1.
1Department of Transplantation Surgery, Center for Research and Innovation in Solid Organ , Transplantation, Aristotle University School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
Background: This study assesses how well artificial intelligence chatbots, particularly OpenAI's ChatGPT and Google's Gemini, can respond to complicated queries and scenarios about transplantation practice and ethics.
Methods: Seven queries or scenarios were posed to these two artificial intelligence chatbots. The scenarios were picked so that experts in transplantation may disagree on the handling strategy of these difficult-to-solve scenarios. The results of the two artificial intelligence chatbots for each scenario were documented and another reply answered by the group of transplant doctors by our transplantation department for each question was documented. The scenarios are listed below:
Results: The two chatbots provided detailed and long answers. In general, the artificial intelligence chatbots tried to provide comprehensive answers, explaining both the advantages and disadvantages of each answer and providing a global perspective to cover all outcomes.
Conclusions: The global and thorough views of the queries provided by the chatbots may be utilized by a surgical team as a comprehensive database or a support tool.