Universal Time: 11:17  |  Local Time: 11:17 (3h GMT)
Select your timezone:

Sex & gender in transplantation

Monday September 23, 2024 - 10:40 to 12:10

Room: 3B-01 Room

229.2 The Impact of Female Sex and Intersectional Disadvantage on Access to Deceased Kidney Transplantation in Australia: a 15 Year National Cohort Study

Stephen Alexander, Australia

Prof
SCHN Children's Hospital at Westmead

Abstract

The impact of female sex and intersectional disadvantage on access to deceased kidney transplantation in australia: A 15 year national cohort study

Tennille L Vitagliano2, Nicole L De La Mata2, Peter S Hsu2,3, Stephen Alexander2,4, Kate Wyburn2,5, Melanie Wyld1,2.

1Renal and Transplant Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia; 2Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; 3Department of Allergy and Immunology, The Children's Hospital Westmead, Westmead, Australia; 4Department of Nephrology, The Children's Hospital Westmead, Westmead, Australia; 5Department of Renal Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia

Aims: We sought to determine if there are sex-based disparities in access to the deceased donor waitlist and/or transplantation, and how intersectional disadvantages such as minority ethnicity, low socio-economic position, cause of kidney failure, and high co-morbidity burden may interact with such disparities, in contemporary Australia.
Methods: A cohort study using the ANZDATA registry (2006-2021) to explore the associations between sex and intersectional disadvantage and  outcomes including waitlisting, deceased donor transplantation, and death. Cox proportional hazards models, two-way interaction models and competing risk analysis adjusted for baseline characteristics were used.
Results: 41,227 patients commenced dialysis during the study period, of which 15,454 (38%) were female, and were followed for 122,400 person-years. In our fully adjusted model, females were 19% less likely to be waitlisted (Hazard Ratio HR]0.81; 95%CI:0.77-0.84), than their male peers. The sex-based disparity in transplant waitlisting was larger for females with intersectional disadvantage including older age (females >45yrs HR 0.78;95%CI:0.74-0.83 compared to their male peers),ethnic minorities (eg. female Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander HR 0.57;95%CI:0.48-0.68, female Asian HR 0.76;95%CI:0.69-0.84), low socio-economic position (HR 0.76; 95%CI: 0.69-0.83), diabetic kidney disease as the cause of kidney failure (HR 0.63;95%CI:0.57-0.69), and having ≥3 co-morbidities (HR 0.69;95%CI:0.57-0.84). There was no significant difference in deceased transplantation rates once waitlisted, or death on the waitlist for any groups.
Conclusions: Females have significantly less access to kidney transplant waitlisting than their male peers, and this sex-based disparity is amplified for females with intersectional disadvantage. Once waitlisted, there are no sex-based disparities in rates of deceased donor transplantation or death.

References:

[1] Sex and gender
[2] Intersectionality
[3] Transplant access

The WebApp is sponsored by