Universal Time: 05:01  |  Local Time: 05:01 (3h GMT)
Select your timezone:

Sex & gender in transplantation

Monday September 23, 2024 - 10:40 to 12:10

Room: 3B-01 Room

229.2 The Impact of Female Sex and Intersectional Disadvantage on Access to Deceased Kidney Transplantation in Australia: a 15 Year National Cohort Study

Melanie Wyld, Australia

Renal and Transplant Physician
Department of Renal and Transplant Medicine
Westmead Hospital

Abstract

The impact of female sex and intersectional disadvantage on access to deceased kidney transplantation in australia: A 15 year national cohort study

Tennille L Vitagliano2, Nicole L De La Mata2, Peter S Hsu2,3, Stephen Alexander2,4, Kate Wyburn2,5, Melanie Wyld1,2.

1Renal and Transplant Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia; 2Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; 3Department of Allergy and Immunology, The Children's Hospital Westmead, Westmead, Australia; 4Department of Nephrology, The Children's Hospital Westmead, Westmead, Australia; 5Department of Renal Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia

Aims: We sought to determine if there are sex-based disparities in access to the deceased donor waitlist and/or transplantation, and how intersectional disadvantages such as minority ethnicity, low socio-economic position, cause of kidney failure, and high co-morbidity burden may interact with such disparities, in contemporary Australia.
Methods: A cohort study using the ANZDATA registry (2006-2021) to explore the associations between sex and intersectional disadvantage and  outcomes including waitlisting, deceased donor transplantation, and death. Cox proportional hazards models, two-way interaction models and competing risk analysis adjusted for baseline characteristics were used.
Results: 41,227 patients commenced dialysis during the study period, of which 15,454 (38%) were female, and were followed for 122,400 person-years. In our fully adjusted model, females were 19% less likely to be waitlisted (Hazard Ratio HR]0.81; 95%CI:0.77-0.84), than their male peers. The sex-based disparity in transplant waitlisting was larger for females with intersectional disadvantage including older age (females >45yrs HR 0.78;95%CI:0.74-0.83 compared to their male peers),ethnic minorities (eg. female Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander HR 0.57;95%CI:0.48-0.68, female Asian HR 0.76;95%CI:0.69-0.84), low socio-economic position (HR 0.76; 95%CI: 0.69-0.83), diabetic kidney disease as the cause of kidney failure (HR 0.63;95%CI:0.57-0.69), and having ≥3 co-morbidities (HR 0.69;95%CI:0.57-0.84). There was no significant difference in deceased transplantation rates once waitlisted, or death on the waitlist for any groups.
Conclusions: Females have significantly less access to kidney transplant waitlisting than their male peers, and this sex-based disparity is amplified for females with intersectional disadvantage. Once waitlisted, there are no sex-based disparities in rates of deceased donor transplantation or death.

References:

[1] Sex and gender
[2] Intersectionality
[3] Transplant access

© 2024 TTS 2024