Ureterovesical leak following renal transplant and effects of acute rejection and antirejection therapy: A nested case-control analysis and outcome of 1102 consecutive renal transplant recipients
Akshay Kriplani1, Anil Mani2, Sanchit Rustagi2, Sanjoy Kumar Sureka2, Uday Pratap Singh2, M.S. Ansari2, Narayan Prasad2, Harshita Sharma2, Aneesh Srivastava3.
1Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Wardha, Maharashtra, India; 2Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India; 3Consultant Urologist, Medanta Hospital, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
Objectives: Studies on nontechnical risk factors for ureterovesical leak after renal transplant are scarce. This study aimed to report the possible pre- and postoperative risk factors and the role of acute rejection and antirejection therapies for urine leak after transplant and its effect on graft and patient survival.
Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 13 patients (1.17%) with urine leak (case group) and 52 patients without leak (control group) (case-to-control ratio of 1:4) from 1102 living related (first degree) renal transplant recipients seen between January 2012 and December 2021. We analyzed demographic and clinical details and biochemical and outcome parameters using a nested case-control design.
Results: Cases were older than controls (P = .018), were more ABO incompatible (P = .009), and had more 6/6 HLA mismatch transplants (P = .047). Donors of cases were older than donors of controls (P = .049). The rate of postoperative hypoalbuminemia was greater in the case group (P = .050). Rates of acute rejection (P = .012) and plasmapheresis (P = .003) were greater in the case group than in the control group. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, recipient age, 6/6 HLA mismatch, and plasmapheresis were found to independently associated with urine leak. None of the patient required surgical repair, as all responded to conservative therapy. Urine leak did not affect graft outcomes (P = .324), but overall survival was less in cases than in controls.
Conclusions: Nontechnical risk factors that cause posttransplant ureteric leak include older donor and recipient age and ABO incompatible and 6/6 HLA mismatch transplants. Acute rejection and plasmapheresis predispose leak, and an indwelling double J stent can allow adequate healing of the anastomosis. High index of suspicion and prompt management are imperative to preserve graft and patient outcome.