Universal Time: 20:01  |  Local Time: 20:01 (3h GMT)
Select your timezone:

P.025 Is a complete viral load suppression required to reduce the risk of cytomegalovirus recurrence in kidney transplant recipients using the preemptive strategy?

Pedro H. Oliveira Sr., Brazil

Clinical Research
Hospital do Rim - Fundação Oswaldo Ramos

Abstract

Is a complete viral load suppression required to reduce the risk of cytomegalovirus recurrence in kidney transplant recipients using the preemptive strategy?

Arthur Heinz Miehrig1, Monica Rika Nakamura1, Pedro Oliveira2, Renato Foresto1,2, Helio Tedesco-Silva1,2, Lúcio Requião-Moura1,2, Jose Medina-Pestana1,2.

1Nephrology Division , Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; 2Hospital do Rim , Fundação Oswaldo Ramos, São Paulo, Brazil

Introduction: To evaluate the impact of two viral load (VL) thresholds for terminating antiviral treatment on the cytomegalovirus (CMV) recurrence in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) following a preemptive strategy.
Methods: A before-and-after quasi-experimental study was conducted on 1,048 CMV IgG-positive KTRs (Mar/2018- Jul/2020). CMV viremia was monitored weekly for three months post-transplant, with antiviral treatment initiated upon asymptomatic viremia exceeding 5,000 IU/mL or symptomatic CMV. In both eras (before and after), the CMV VL was monitored to guide the duration of therapy, aiming to achieve a completely undetectable VL (era before, Mar/2018-Jul/2019, n= 664) or once the VL was 200 IU/mL (era after, Aug/2019-Jul/2020, n= 384). The primary outcome was CMV recurrence.
Results: All patients received a single 3.0 mg/kg dose of rATG for induction and were maintained on a regimen of tacrolimus (99.5%), prednisone (100%), and mycophenolate (100%). In the entire cohort, 515 patients (49.1%) required preemptive CMV treatment; of these, 320 (30.5%) were asymptomatic, and 195 (18.6%) met the criteria for CMV disease. The median treatment duration was 27 days (21-33), with an 11.4% overall incidence of CMV recurrence. When comparing the two eras, no differences were observed in recipient characteristics, but in the era after, donors were older (54 vs. 52 years old, p=0.003) with a higher frequency of deceased donors (94.3% vs. 90.2%, p=0.02). The frequency of patients requiring a first CMV treatment (50.5% before vs. 46.9% after, p=0.26) and the incidence of CMV disease (20.3% vs. 15.3%, p=0.33) was similar in both eras. The time to achieve the CMV treatment goal decreased significantly post-protocol change from 27 (22-35) days in the era before to 23 (19-29) after (p<0.001), with no impact on the incidence of CMV recurrence: 10.8% before vs. 12.2% after, p=0.24 (HR= 1.29, 95%CI=0.89-1.87, p=0.17).
Conclusions: Adjusting preemptive strategy thresholds to allow a low but detectable VL at the cessation of antiviral therapy significantly shortened treatment duration without increasing CMV recurrence risk, thereby offering a potentially optimized approach for managing CMV in KTRs.

References:

[1] cytomegalovirus
[2] viral load
[3] preemptive strategy
[4] cytomegalovirus recurrence
[5] kidney transplantation
[6] CMV viremia
[7] CMV infecction
[8] CMV disease
[9] incidence of CMV recurrence
[10] threshold

The WebApp is sponsored by