Universal Time: 00:54  |  Local Time: 00:54 (3h GMT)
Select your timezone:

Virtual Abstracts to assigned to Sessions

Monday October 21, 2024 - 12:00 to 14:00

Room: TBD

V-213.5 Donor audits in deceased organ donation: A scoping review

Amina R Silva, Canada

Assistant Professor
Nursing
Brock University

Abstract

Donor audits in deceased organ donation: A scoping review

Amina Silva1, Jehan Lalani2, Lee James2, Shauna O'Donnell3, Alexandre Amar-Zifkin3, Sam Shemie2, Samara Zavalkoff4.

1Nursing Department, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, Canada; 2Organ and Tissue Donation, Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, ON, Canada; 3Research Institute , McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada; 4Division of Critical Care, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada

Background: Organ transplantation is a cost-effective treatment for organ failure, but a significant gap exists between the number of available organs and the demand for transplants. Donor audits (DA) have been proposed as a tool to identify barriers in the deceased organ donation process and guide quality improvement efforts. However, there is limited comprehensive evidence on the use and impact of DA in clinical settings. Therefore, in this study we sought to collate and summarize existing literature on DA and how they have been used to guide deceased organ donation and transplantation system performance and quality assurance.
Methods: This scoping review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidance and PRISMA-ScR reporting standards. We conducted a systematic search of the literature on MEDLINE, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Web of Science supplemented by Google on 6 May 2022. We aimed to search studies published after 1995 in English, French, and Spanish. Eligible studies included that reporting on DA focusing on estimating potential and actual deceased organ donors in various healthcare settings.
Results: From 2,416 unique citations, 52 studies met the inclusion criteria. The majority focused on estimating potential donors and quantifying actual donors, highlighting missed donation opportunities, with most studies conducted in the UK and published between 2001 and 2006. Motivations for DA included enhancing donation programs and guiding quality improvement efforts. Barriers to donation included family decline and failure to identify potential donors. Quality improvement initiatives suggested include enhancing healthcare professionals' education and improving donor management protocols.
Conclusion: DA provides valuable insights into deceased organ donation programs and can help identify missed donation opportunities and barriers in clinical settings. Strategies to address these barriers, such as improving family approaches and strengthening donation practices, may enhance access to organ transplants. Further research is needed to assess the efficacy of DA in improving organ donation rates and transplant outcomes.

This study has been funded by Canadian Blood Services.

References:

[1] Donor audits
[2] Organ donation
[3] Organ allocation
[4] Donor utilization

The WebApp is sponsored by