Evaluating a decentralized dd-cfDNA assay for kidney allograft rejection monitoring: A comparative analysis
Alexandre Loupy1,2, Anais Certain1, Narin Tangprasertchai3, Maud Rapace1, Cindy Ursule-Dufait1, Kawthar Benbadi1, Marc Raynaud1, Evgeniya Vaskova3, Corina Marchis3, Silvia Casas3, Tim Hague3, Oriol Bestard4, Delphine Kervella4, Carmen Lefaucheur1, Thierry Viard3, Olivier Aubert1,2.
1Université Paris Cité, INSERM U970, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration PITOR, Paris, France; 2Department of Kidney Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique & Kidney Transplant Depar, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; 3R&D, CareDx, Inc, Brisbane, CA, United States; 4Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
After transplantation, allograft rejection poses the most significant risk to graft survival, leading to mortality, morbidity, and decreased quality of life. The current gold standard for diagnosing rejection involves invasive and costly tissue biopsies, which can be subject to interpretation errors. While various biomarkers offer less invasive alternatives with reduced risk and greater convenience, their sensitivity and specificity may vary. The emergence of donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) as biomarker for graft injury represents a promising breakthrough in diagnosing post-transplantation allograft injuries. dd-cfDNA, released by the allograft into the recipient's bloodstream post-transplant, increases in cases of injury, rejection, or malfunction. Genetically distinct from the recipient's own cfDNA, dd-cfDNA can be quantified at low levels, making it an effective biomarker for post-transplant surveillance.
This study evaluates the effectiveness of AlloSeq cfDNA, a decentralized, NGS-based testing kit, compared to the established standard, AlloSure Kidney, to enhance allograft rejection monitoring. Kidney transplant recipients (n=580) from 3 referral centers underwent measurements (603 total evaluations) with AlloSeq cfDNA and AlloSure Kidney dd-cfDNA measurements alongside allograft biopsies. Correlation between assays was evaluated using r-squared (r2) and Spearman’s rank correlation test, and associations with rejection using logistic regression analyses. Mean dd-cfDNA levels from AlloSeq cfDNA and AlloSure Kidney were 0.51 ± 0.81% and 0.43 ± 0.78%, respectively. The assays were highly correlated, with r2 = 0.95 and Spearman’s rank correlation 0.88 (p-value < 0.0001). Mean dd-cfDNA levels were 1.15 ± 1.60% with and 0.39 ± 0.48% without rejection (p < 0.0001) for AlloSeq cfDNA, and 1.06 ± 1.47% with and 0.31 ± 0.49% without rejection (p < 0.0001) for AlloSure Kidney.
Both tests showed significant association with allograft rejection (p < 0.0001). Additionally, consistency between the assays was confirmed across various clinical scenarios, including post-transplant timepoint, allograft stability, and different rejection subcategories (antibody-mediated, T-cell mediated, or mixed rejection). The AlloSeq cfDNA assay provides precise results within 24 hours, requiring minimal input and offering flexibility suitable for centers of all sizes. This ensures convenience in clinical practice and enhances patient care.
CareDx, Inc. supplied reagents and service, free of charge, for the testing included on the study.
[1] donor-derived cell-free DNA
[2] dd-cfDNA
[3] Kidney
[4] monitoring
[5] post-transplant
[6] post-transplantation
[7] liquid biopsy
[8] biopsy
[9] rejection