Universal Time: 20:13  |  Local Time: 20:13 (3h GMT)
Select your timezone:

P.063 Comparison of preoperative desensitization strategies in ABO-incompatible living kidney transplantation and subsequent COVID-19 infection

Puxun Tian, People's Republic of China

The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University

Abstract

Comparison of preoperative desensitization strategies in ABO-incompatible living kidney transplantation and subsequent COVID-19 infection

Puxun Tian1, Zejiaxin Niu1, Meng Dou1, Jing Yang1, Tian Wei1.

1Department of Kidney Transplantation,Nephropathy Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi 'an, Shaanxi Province, People's Republic of China

Introduction: ABO-incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation presents a significant challenge due to preformed antibodies against donor blood antigens. Successful transplantation often necessitates robust preoperative desensitization to mitigate these antibodies. With the emergence of COVID-19, it is crucial to understand how these methods impact susceptibility to the virus post-transplantation. This study aims to compare the efficacy of two desensitization protocols in ABOi living kidney transplant recipients.
Methods: The outcomes of 8 ABOi living kidney transplantations were retrospectively analyzed, divided into two groups based on the preoperative desensitization regimen. Group 1 (n=6) underwent conventional immunoadsorption (IA) or plasmapheresis (PP), while Group 2 (n=2) received lymphoplasmapheresis. Anti-blood type antibody titers were assessed before and after desensitization, as well as post-transplantation, with monitoring of serum creatinine levels and immune function changes. Lastly, the incidence and severity of COVID-19 infection after transplantation were also evaluated.
Results: Both desensitization approaches effectively reduced anti-blood type antibody titers to below 16 preoperatively. Post-transplantation, only one Group 1 patient exhibited elevated antibody titers. Significant decreases in serum creatinine within the first post-transplantation month were observed in both groups (ranging from 62-179 umol/L). No notable differences in immune function were noted between the groups. Among the two patients who received lymphoplasmapheresis, one did not contract COVID-19, and the other developed a mild case with a PCR cycle threshold (Ct) value <30, indicating low viral load. Conversely, four out of six patients who underwent IA/PP developed COVID-19, presenting with more severe symptoms, including pulmonary infiltrates, and all had Ct values >30, suggesting higher viral loads.
Conclusion: This study suggests that both conventional immunoadsorption/plasma exchange and lymphoplasmapheresis are viable for preoperative desensitization in ABOi kidney transplantation. These methods successfully decrease blood type antibody levels, enhance transplantation outcomes, and maintain comparable post-transplantation renal function and immune status. Larger studies are warranted to determine the optimal desensitization strategy for ABOi kidney transplant recipients.

References:

[1] ABO-incompatible, Kidney Transplantation, Desensitization, Immunoadsorption, Plasma Exchange, Lymphoplasmapheresis, Antibody Titer.

The WebApp is sponsored by